Skip to main content

Week 5 - I'm back!!! Finally hahha - Part 1 of 2

Hi guys! I'm back after quite a long hiatus. Been avoiding the internet for a while. Kind of overwhelmed by all the communication - I'm a bit of a hermit you see. Anyway, in the past few weeks I have been trying to learn and get into investing. It is a really tough topic to get into, especially if you are going into securities and derivatives. 

Having said that, I've been wondering how it would be possible to develop a learning community or rather a community of practice with regard to investments. I would imagine that it would be quite difficult on the following grounds. Firstly, there is no such thing as a sure-fire investment - all investments come with an innate risk, no matter how small. Benjamin Graham, one of the invest gurus of the 20th century argued that investment is less about learning how to grow money, than learning how to keep it. Consequently, with risk tolerance differing from person to person, and the fact that any investment has the chance of going sour, I would imagine that individuals could feel cheated or slighted if they follow the advice of a member of a community and made a loss. 

Building on this, is the idea of tangible loss. In investment, it's not like other communities of practice where you might be working towards something intangible, or a product that if undeveloped would not accrue a loss for the community and individual members. Rather, in this scenario, a bad buy could result, especially if leveraged with margin accounts, in the wiping of an individual's life savings. In turn, common investment etiquette would argue that individuals should not ask or provide opinions on their investments per se. 

Now these two issues alone represent quite a challenge to set up an investment CoP. Stay tuned for my next post where I look over some possible rules to implement to stave these challenges off. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

Thinking of produsage

I've been trying to think about the produsage topic and it seems to me that I have come to a bit of a ID's block. I think one thing that I am worried about is that I might be biting off more than I could chew - and in doing so, unnecessarily increase my workload in a period where all the major assignments of my other modules are beginning to pile up. Regardless, my extreme idea for now is as such. Concept: Using role-playing games that focus on ethical and moral dilemmas to facilitate discussions on morality among military officers. Medium: The role-playing game can be developed on a various levels - technically it should be written from the Second-person perspective, for example " You see a child clutching a hand-grenade, trembling, walking ever so slowly towards you"  . I would imagine that based on the time I have, I would scale the quality of the development from Microsoft Powerpoint being the lowest, to a game engine like a visual novel maker. (I am current...
1 comment
Read more

Week 10: Reflection Post

I'm going to do my reflection post a bit early this time because I have a few more assignments to complete before the end of the week. I think the main thing that's on my mind now, coming to the end of the course is the question of evaluation: How do we evaluate a produsage-centered course? Do we evaluate it like how we would an instructional course? Using Kirkpatrick's 4 levels of evaluation: Level 1 - Trainee sentiments of the course. I would imagine that this would examine: Metrics examining platforms' usability. Metrics examining instructor proficiency and helpfulness. Metrics examining effectiveness of material. Metrics examining relevance of material. Largely survey-based I think on a usual likert scale. Level 2 - Trainee Proficiency This would probably examine: Trainee's understanding of civil military relations. Trainee's understanding of military law. Trainee's understanding of just war doctrine and application of Jus ad bellum...
Post a Comment
Read more

Week 10 - Extended Realities Technologies as part of Produsage (Part 2)

I thought I should really try to delve into and draft out my produsage assignment a bit more so that I can get a head start before the submission next sunday. I got 4 different assignments to submit by the same deadline, so things are likely to get pretty crazy - doesn't help that I have one more assignment to submit four days after! Haaahhahah! This blog will probably go dark next week - will cash in all my remaining tokens to clear out all the work.  Produsage Assignment: Concept   Theories of Learning and Cognition to be used:  Constructivism - Uses optimally guided instructional model as articulated by Michael Hannafin et al., (1997) Hannafin, M. J., Hannafin, K. M., Land, S. M., & Oliver, K. (1997). Grounded practice and the design of constructivist learning environments.  Educational Technology Research and Development ,  45 (3), 101–117. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02299733 Information processing theory  Overall framework to guide ...
Post a Comment
Read more