Skip to main content

Reflections for Week 2, questions for weeks ahead.

Finally at the end of week 2! 

There was so much covered this week! Specifically, the hive mind, digital natives, produsage and youth, and finally the lives of the highly networked. I think my main takeaways for the week centered largely on two things that I will be looking into in the coming weeks. Firstly, the notion of facilitating collaboration and communication. What are the best practices involved in creating a platform for collaboration? What are the key attitudes and facets of culture to be implemented? In particular, would communities of practice be a natural outflow of attempting to create a professional produsage community in my organization? What are the physical elements that are required? Digital networks of a certain speed, certain applications and such? 

Secondly, the notion of getting individuals to value the collaborative process and community. The more I read on the application of hive mind modalities to education and learning, the more I thought about the notion of the Premack principle. Individuals usually gravitate towards performing in areas that they instinctively value. How then do we make produsage communities and activities instinctively valuable to individuals who would otherwise not be interested? Even more so, how do we sustain interest? Surely it has to be more than attracting individuals with a spanking new interface (not that that does not help). Or perhaps it works as such - individuals come for the benefits that directly contribute to their individual endeavors but stay for the community that eventually is subsumed under his/her identity or perhaps pride themselves in their contributions and achievements in the community. All of this sounds eerily familiar to what I've read about communities of practice. Looking forward to learning about CoPs and how I could utilize their concepts in web 2.0 modalities. 

Comments

Post a Comment

Popular posts from this blog

I'm back - Part 2 of 2

Building on what I mentioned in the last post on developing a community of practice for investment. I can think of just a few ideas, based on my reading of the subject. Essentially, I would argue that the community requires at least three main elements. Firstly, a common agreement or set of guidelines that dictate expectations on investment advice shared in the community can help to make clear two things - the possibility of success or profit as a result of said investment (namely that no investment is comes without risk) and, the expectation of adherence of advice between investors (namely, only you decide what you invest in - do not wildly trust others).  Secondly, a method of arbitration and moderation of disputes and information posted in the community. I would imagine that this is necessary to ensure that (1) fake news is not posted in the community that could harm it and, (2) to help ascertain veracity in disputes between investors/ members of the community. The main issue of...
Post a Comment
Read more

Week 10: Reflection Post

I'm going to do my reflection post a bit early this time because I have a few more assignments to complete before the end of the week. I think the main thing that's on my mind now, coming to the end of the course is the question of evaluation: How do we evaluate a produsage-centered course? Do we evaluate it like how we would an instructional course? Using Kirkpatrick's 4 levels of evaluation: Level 1 - Trainee sentiments of the course. I would imagine that this would examine: Metrics examining platforms' usability. Metrics examining instructor proficiency and helpfulness. Metrics examining effectiveness of material. Metrics examining relevance of material. Largely survey-based I think on a usual likert scale. Level 2 - Trainee Proficiency This would probably examine: Trainee's understanding of civil military relations. Trainee's understanding of military law. Trainee's understanding of just war doctrine and application of Jus ad bellum...
Post a Comment
Read more

Week 10 - Extended Realities Technologies as part of Produsage (Part 2)

I thought I should really try to delve into and draft out my produsage assignment a bit more so that I can get a head start before the submission next sunday. I got 4 different assignments to submit by the same deadline, so things are likely to get pretty crazy - doesn't help that I have one more assignment to submit four days after! Haaahhahah! This blog will probably go dark next week - will cash in all my remaining tokens to clear out all the work.  Produsage Assignment: Concept   Theories of Learning and Cognition to be used:  Constructivism - Uses optimally guided instructional model as articulated by Michael Hannafin et al., (1997) Hannafin, M. J., Hannafin, K. M., Land, S. M., & Oliver, K. (1997). Grounded practice and the design of constructivist learning environments.  Educational Technology Research and Development ,  45 (3), 101–117. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02299733 Information processing theory  Overall framework to guide ...
Post a Comment
Read more